| | | OFFLINE | | | Post: 585 | Registrato il: 16/11/2007
| Età: 34 | Sesso: Maschile | | SUPERSTAR | |
|
 28/02/2009 00:28 | |
I think it's possible for us to get triple threat match between HBK Kozlov and Taker after seeing Kozlov pined taker on Smackdown.
What do you guys think? I personally dont mind this, esp when they are not building HBK and Taker feud as personal/legendary feud, it just seem like HBK wanted to challenged taker just to piss JBL off. |
| |
|
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 229 | Registrato il: 09/07/2008
| Età: 29 | Sesso: Maschile | | MID CARDER | |
|
| 28/02/2009 04:05 | |
They couldn't could they, take HBK v Taker away from us |
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 2.116 | Registrato il: 11/01/2007
| Sesso: Maschile | | CHAIRMAN | |
|
| 28/02/2009 09:33 | |
Eugster, 28/02/2009 10:05:
They couldn't could they, take HBK v Taker away from us
Yes they could. And that's what I'm starting to think at the moment. Koslov winning over Taker was bizarre and does give them grounds for a proper rematch at 'Mania. Plus they will bill it as the undefeated streak vs "undefeated" streak the big PPV.
Obviously HBK/Taker would be gold, but it is extremely hard to second guess WWE these days with their penchant for trying to outdo the 'smarks'.
I really don't think a three-way would work either as it would take the gloss of a HBK/Taker confrontation. But then what do you do with the loser of Koslov/HBK?
THE CHUMP IS QUEER!
--------------------------
Classic Quotes from 'Addicted To Love' Rhett Titus:
-The thrust is a must
-I've got shoulders the size of boulders
-Check out my back and on the other side of that is a chiselled six-pack
-'Addicted To Love' Rhett Titus still gots what it takes to make the ladies scream, cream and think about me in their dreams
-The ladies will quiver when I swivel because everyone knows, brother, that my delts will make them all melt
-I’ll show why ladies gab about abs, squeak for obliques, and confess while touching my chest
-Hammys that win Grammys
-People say, Rhett Titus you don't have what it takes to lace up Brian Danielson's boots. Well you know what, I may not know how to lace up Brian Danielson's boots, but Brian Danielson does not have what it takes to fill out Rhett Titus' trunks, brother. And you know what, it's even a tight squeeze for me, and I know a thing or two about tight squeezes. And I also know a thing or two when things are wide open
-My shoulders aren’t the only thing on me as hard as boulders, baby
--------------------------
Credit to WWE.com for the photo
|
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | | Post: 0 | Registrato il: 28/02/2009
| Età: 41 | Sesso: Femminile | | JOBBER | |
|
| 28/02/2009 15:11 | |
I sure hope Koslov isn't involved in Taker's match.
I mean it's Wrestlemania 25 and it's in Texas... SURELY it will be Undertaker vs HBK! |
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 487 | Registrato il: 24/09/2006
| Età: 35 | Sesso: Maschile | | MAIN EVENTER | |
|
| 01/03/2009 02:24 | |
Or maybe neither Vladimir or Michaels will face Undertaker at Mania. I dont know, thats just thinking outside the box. I still think it will be one of them but I'm not going to rule out neither of them winning because WWE has been doing that lately. Examples are at Survivor Series and Royal Rumble where Edge won while not being scheduled in those matches. |
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 299 | Registrato il: 02/11/2005
| Sesso: Maschile | | MID CARDER | |
|
| 01/03/2009 06:29 | |
I still think it'll be HBK/Taker, i think they're going for the whole kozlov beat taker, and hbk beat kozlov, so hbk is hyped up big to end taker's streak at 'Mania routine.
Stick koszlov in MITB or something, as long as he's not involved in one of the biggest matches of literally all time i'm happy.
" i still have 200 more holds to list "
|
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 3.939 | Registrato il: 09/03/2004
| Età: 35 | Sesso: Maschile | | LIVING LEGEND | |
|
| 01/03/2009 18:35 | |
Stick Koslov in MITB? What?! Why?
Why on Earth would you place him in MITB, considering he would, probably, look so clumsy trying to climb up the ladder. Granted he could dominate and look somewhat good, but him retrieving the briefcase would look so odd.
Makaveli - Killuminati |
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 488 | Registrato il: 24/09/2006
| Età: 35 | Sesso: Maschile | | MAIN EVENTER | |
|
| 01/03/2009 20:26 | |
Stick Koslov in MITB? What?! Why?
Why on Earth would you place him in MITB, considering he would, probably, look so clumsy trying to climb up the ladder. Granted he could dominate and look somewhat good, but him retrieving the briefcase would look so odd.
Because everyone thinks of the MITB to be a match at mania where all the good popular wrestlers are thrown in because there wasnt a feud in mind for them or no room for more matches. Everyone is right though because that's how it's actually used.
So that's probably why he just said put him in MITB. I myself agree with you that he would be out of place in that match, it would look odd. [Modificato da $C@$H M0N3Y$ 01/03/2009 20:28] |
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 1.941 | Registrato il: 07/09/2005
| Età: 34 | Sesso: Maschile | | CHAIRMAN | |
|
| 03/03/2009 14:37 | |
$C@$H M0N3Y$, 3/2/2009 2:26 AM:
Stick Koslov in MITB? What?! Why?
Why on Earth would you place him in MITB, considering he would, probably, look so clumsy trying to climb up the ladder. Granted he could dominate and look somewhat good, but him retrieving the briefcase would look so odd.
Because everyone thinks of the MITB to be a match at mania where all the good popular wrestlers are thrown in because there wasnt a feud in mind for them or no room for more matches. Everyone is right though because that's how it's actually used.
So that's probably why he just said put him in MITB. I myself agree with you that he would be out of place in that match, it would look odd.
I say just can Kozlov. He's duller than Steve Blackman and has a far worse moveset. 
credit: brcherres,spooky,and boydmachine |
| |
| | | OFFLINE | | | Post: 0 | Registrato il: 08/03/2009
| Età: 44 | Sesso: Maschile | | JOBBER | |
|
| 08/03/2009 03:47 | |
I hop it's to be a big match and not to let taker loss at this time
Thanks |
| |
|
|